作　者：金宏宇
关键词：限制阐释；文献；文本；阐释循环；语文学
摘　要：

“强制阐释”或“过度阐释”是一种不好的阐释。好的或合理的阐释应该是“限制阐释”。限制阐释要求阐释主体克服“前见”“动机”等主观限制而遵从一些客观的限制，由此可以确立限制阐释的基本规则或方法。一是要用各种相关的起源性、外围性、互文性的文献去限定目标文本的阐释。二是阐释应受限于文本本身，从文本出发的阐释必须关注文本的虚实纵横等不同维度。三是阐释活动要经历文本内、文本边和文本外的多圈层阐释循环。四是阐释的最质朴的学术取径或学问根底是回归“语文学”。只有求限于这些相对客观的阐释规则，才能抵抗场外理论的过多征用，对治文学阐释的“无限”症候。

 

Restrained Interpretation

The Analysis of Modern Chinese Literary Texts

Jin Hongyu（Wuhan University）

Abstract   Neither "strained interpretation" nor "overinterpretation" is a decent form of interpretation.    A decent or rational form of interpretation should be "restrained interpretation", which requires the subjects of interpretation restrain themselves from any subjective preconceptions or motives but subject to some objective factors. Thereby the basic rules of or approaches to restrained interpretation can be established as follows: firstly, under the paradigm of restrained interpretation, interpretation of the literary text should be circumscribed by its paratexts, which comprise historical or literary details to the origin, evolution and intertextuality of the text; secondly, interpretation of the literary text should be confined to the text itself and an examination of the various dimensions of the text is highly imperative; thirdly, the interpretative practice goes through a multi-layered loop of interpretation that travels through the literary text, its paratexts, and the peripheral space; lastly, the most down-to-earth path to interpretation, as well as the academic basis of interpretation should be a return to philology. The overuse of the out-of-the-field theories and the propensity for "infinite" literary interpretations can be effectively mitigated through observing these relatively objective rules of restrained interpretation.

Key words restrained interpretation; literature; literary texts; loop of interpretation; philology

 

■作者简介 金宏宇，文学博士，武汉大学文学院教授、博士生导师；湖北 武汉 430072。

[PDF]（下载数：）