作　者：王时中
关键词：国家理由；自由主义；黑格尔；康德；反思性判断力
摘　要：

近代以来关于“国家理由”的论证中，以基督教二元主义政治观为背景的自由主义与在思辨神学的框架中展开的黑格尔主义，各执一端，互相反对。如果以市民社会与国家之间的关系为线索，以康德的“判断力批判”为视角，重构马克思批判黑格尔法哲学的进路，则不仅可以揭示出黑格尔法哲学的思辨哲学根源，提炼出一种既不同于自由主义、又不同于黑格尔主义的国家形式，而且还可能将这种形式与中国传统社会的批判性分析予以对接。在更高的层次重构马克思的法哲学批判，当是突破“国家理由”之二律背反，激活马克思主义哲学之当代潜力的推进方向。

 

On the Antinomy of the "State's Reason"

Kantian Reconstruction of Marx's Critique on Hegel's Legal Philosophy

Wang Shizhong（Xiamen University）

Abstract In the argumentation of the "state's reason" in modern times, there are two opposite ideas; liberalism based on the political dualism of Christianity and Hegelianism developed in the framework of speculative theology have different sides and are opposed to each other. To reconstruct Marx's approach to Hegel's legal philosophy with the relationship between the civil society and the state as a clue from Kantian's perspective of "criticism of judgment", will reveal the speculative and philosophical roots of Hegel's legal philosophy and extract a state form different from both liberalism or Hegelianism, and it might be possible to connect this form with the critical analysis of traditional Chinese society. Reconstructing Marx's critique of legal philosophy at a higher level, should be a way to break through the antinomy of the "state's reason" and activate the contemporary potential of Marxism philosophy.

Key words state's reason; liberalism; Hegel; Kant; reflective judgment

 

■作者简介 王时中，哲学博士，厦门大学哲学系教授、博士生导师；福建 厦门 361005。

[PDF]（下载数：）