作　者：裴丽萍 张启彬
关键词：自然资源所有权； 自然资源使用权制度； 林权； 林权束； 《森林法》修改
摘　要：

2016年9月底公开征求意见的《森林法》修改意见稿明确了林权权利类型及内容，并进一步放松了林权流转的限制，成为修法亮点。然而，修改意见稿回避林权与森林资源公有产权的关系，导致林权性质和内容均存制度扞格：如森林财产权体系“一物二权”、林权束结构叠床架屋，此无助于达致“山定权、树定根、人定心”的林改初衷。事实上，森林资源公有产权所有权——使用权的“两权分离”是林权产生的制度逻辑；作为“森林资源所有权”拆分的碎片，林权系以森林和林地为客体，包含森林使用权、林地使用权和林地承包权、经营权的用益物权权利束。

Constructing Forest Tenure: Examinations Enlightened by the Latest Publicized Revision Draft of Forestry Code
 

Pei Liping & Zhang Qibin （Huazhong University of Science & Technology）

Abstract:The Revising Draft of Forestry Code,released for publicity and enquiry in late september 2016,has unprecedentedly underscored the legislative attempt to typify,codified and liquidated forest tenure,which should been exultantly applauded by forestry and legal practitioners alike.However,the evasive gesture expressed in this revision towards the liaison between forest tenure and forest public ownership,has complicated the conceptualization and clarification of forestry property scheme,such as dual ownership,overlapping incidents etc.,and frustrated the original intention of forest tenure reform: assuring land and tree tenure,and pacifying the owner’s inquietude of unjust takings by state.Based on the theoretical model of separating the usufruct from fee simple,forest tenure,as debris incidents bundle of forest simple,should be comprised of usufructs on forest and forestry land.
 

Key words:ownership of natural resources; usufruct institution of natural resources; forestry code; forest tenure; the incidents bundle of forest tenure; the amendment of forestry code

[PDF]（下载数：）